I’m going to be controversial here. If I worked for a corporate I might have been called in and told that I cannot express my opinion in this way. But thank goodness I’m unemployed, so I can have my say. And sorry, the letter is a bit long this week.
Yet again, over the last 2 weeks another ‘Ponzi’ scheme has been in the news because it collapsed. Billions of Rands of investor money gone. Many investors have lost everything, maybe some will get back a few cents in the Rand when investigations and winds up are all done. The principal owner/operator has turned himself in at a police station, thinking he will be safer in jail than on the street.
Why was this money lost? Because it actually never owned anything, any assets. I have gone on at times about how your money in a unit trust fund actually owns assets, either actual shares of companies, or bonds or listed property, etc. In such a scheme as the above, it is very hard to know what’s being owned, if anything at all. People begin to get great ‘returns’, but these are shown either by statements that simply get generated but mean nothing, or through income payments on a monthly or whatever basis. All appears very good so they tell their mates. The operating company/guy even does presentations to people, showing these ‘returns’. It might run very successfully for years, for many years, while money keeps coming in. It eventually collapses, either because whatever electronic game and equation that was being played in the background to manipulate the ‘potential’ value of the investments backfires, (because nothing is actually being owned) and/or because a few investors begin wanting to draw all or a lot of their money out and the system suddenly begins to have a cash flow problem. Your income is initially paid out from the funds received by the scheme, but later, the income might be getting paid out by the next inflow. Not good….
Why do people go here? Many folk want to make their own choices for investing, not using the right process to identify something that might not work, not using the right person or not knowing how to really dig down, determine, ask the right questions, see what’s going on. Many investors in this example were even advised to go in by registered Financial Advisors and apparently the offering was even registered with our industry authorities. (But in my opinion, the people working in these industry regulatory spaces – they are just humans, not necessarily knowing themselves what to ask)
I have had an ‘investment scheme’ presented to me many years ago. It was a property syndication that eventually collapsed. You didn’t get your money back. The guy who brought this to me….. the numbers simply didn’t make sense to my simple brain. Expected returns were claimed to be xyz. I said to him your return figures are irrelevant because you cannot control an expected return. Commissions were too much: this is how they succeed in getting some advisors to market their product – they offer to pay us too much. He couldn’t explain the underlying ownership well enough and clients wouldn’t be able to draw their funds out for an initial time period. That’s always a raised flag to me: all assets based on the stock market are saleable within a few days. Anyway… I invited the guy to leave my office and that was that. I had colleagues that invested their clients in this, and these colleagues were so distraught when their clients lost their money. I said to them but this and that and the other… They said but they thought this and that. Too late.